The Amp Hour Electronics Podcast

A weekly show about the trends in the electronic industry.

  • For Us
    • Donate
    • Link Here!
    • Suggest
      • Guest Suggestions
      • Story Suggestions
      • Feature My Workbench!
    • Advertising
  • For You
    • Episode Index
    • Guest Episodes
    • Buy Stuff
  • About
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
You are here: Home / Radio Show / #118 – Kickstarter, Open Source RC & Modelsource – Facinorous Financial Foulness

#118 – Kickstarter, Open Source RC & Modelsource – Facinorous Financial Foulness

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS

For those interested, there is also now a transcript available for episode 118

 

 

This week Chris and Dave get talking about the intersection of money and electronics and all the craziness that can ensue.

  • Yes, Chris still has far too many web sites, many of which are dormant.
    • Chip Report TV is going strong, there’s a new one available.
      [tube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uOmNP-J4e8[/tube]
    • ChrisGammell.com just got a refresh, though is the same content.
    • Engineer Blogs is dying, much to Dave’s disappointment.
    • Chris’s other podcast, The Engineering Commons, is going strong and has new episodes every 2 weeks.
    • And if that weren’t bad enough, Chris is talking about starting a kickstarter! What a nutjob.
  • Would you start your own Kickstarter? Why or why not?
  • The Open Source RC project is not going to continue development.
  • A123 has also declared bankruptcy and sold its assets to Johnson Controls. There’s an article detailing what went wrong there.
  • Solyndra also folded, but more likely due to designing for the wrong variable: the price of polysilicon.
  • The Altium Founder and CEO has gotten the boot from the board of directors.
  • Boards of directors are in it for the shareholders, no one else. NXP is pondering splitting the company. Hope it doesn’t affect our designs!
  • Design Spark did a website refresh and has a (new?) feature called Modelsource that allows you to download footprints for a variety of CAD software.
  • There are other paid systems that are out there, like Ultra Librarian from Accelerated Designs, but is it worth it?
  • James Dyson has invested $8 million in a student incubator. Would you spend your fortune on something like this?
  • Do you need to remain a CTO to make it as a nerd, even if you start your own company? Is Bob Dobkin (from LT) able to survive because he’s kept doing the tech stuff he loves?
  • adafruit has bootstrapped their own space and it looks huge and awesome! Photos by @bekathwia. Congrats!
  • Amazon rumored to be looking at buying the OMAP line from TI? Does this make sense?
  • Cool BGA routability guidelines from Xilinx. Looks like artwork!
  • Dave had never heard of a Rorschach Test. Chris had really only known about it because of The Watchmen 🙂
  • What kind of Myers Brigg personality are you? Take the test here and then let us know below.

 

Thanks to espensorvik for the picture of the money, phone and coke.

Comments

  1. cmc says

    October 22, 2012 at 12:06 am

    The personality test page does not seem to work for now…

  2. HAL-42B says

    October 22, 2012 at 5:01 am

    Some deep proletariat talk this week :))

  3. Manny says

    October 22, 2012 at 5:56 am

    Regarding the OMAP being bought by TI there might be something in it for Amazon.

    Basically the SoC market these days are being dominated by 4 big platforms that are in most smartphones, tablets and TV’s. Samsung Exynos, Nvidia Tegra, TI OMAP and Snapdragon by Qualcomm. Even though concrete numbers are hard to come by most people would agree that OMAP is the least successful.

    So maybe Amazon sees a potential opportunity to buy this line. Not the Fab per se but the IP for the chipset and like Dave said have more control over their hardware and tweak to their needs as they see fit.

    **************

    If I had the money then i would defiantly use to fund interesting ideas but also a part of me wants to start a Thomas Edison type of lab where he had every element or compound possible but only in my case with electronics.

    *****************
    Also for some reason the the link for the Myer Biggs does not work so you have to go the homeapge of the website and click on the Jung Test.

    • rasz says

      October 22, 2012 at 9:19 am

      correct link to the test is
      http://similarminds.com/jung.html

      • Chris Gammell says

        October 22, 2012 at 9:24 am

        Thanks Rasz!

    • Yi Yao says

      October 22, 2012 at 3:51 pm

      As for chip fabs, low margins and tight operational deadlines, Amazon seems to be pretty good at that kind of stuff with AWS, their supply chain, etc.

  4. Richard says

    October 22, 2012 at 8:59 am

    Schadenfreude is pronounced (very roughly) ‘shahden froyde’ (the ‘e’ at the end of ‘freude’ is a schwa).

    There’s an audio file on Wiktionary

    • Chris Gammell says

      October 22, 2012 at 9:25 am

      I’ll get it right one of these weeks. I love the word, I do not love trying other languages. I guess I need to stumble in order to learn, eh? Thanks for the link.

      • Jope says

        October 23, 2012 at 6:38 am

        The best “How to pronounce” videos are here:
        http://www.youtube.com/user/PronunciationManual

        Schadenfreude: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3_DjiLLDfo
        Or some French: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DSgsON3u8E

        • rasz says

          October 24, 2012 at 8:02 am

          AHAHAHA I hate you, Im gonna remember one of them as correct and make an ass of myself (even bigger one than usual)

  5. rasz says

    October 22, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Open Source RC project :

    – was NEVER open source. There was no source code, no design files. The only open source thing there was the logo 🙂
    – They tried selling UNLICENSED transmitters on US market (wrong band, no CE, no FCC)
    – They got kicked out of kickstarter, moved to indiegogo, got kicked from there as well, finally made their own “kickstarterlike” website.
    – whole thing was basically repackaged Chinese $50 Tabled he (doubt there was more than one guy there) tried selling for ~$300 alone. Additional bridge hardware talking to unlicensed transmitter and pots/buttons was another $400.
    – there was NEVER a working prototype. Even his kickstarter videos didnt show any working hardware, not even a working mockup, only his talking head and a ‘vision’ of what could be possible. Even his website has no pictures of that tablet displaying UI.

    It was “hey I have an idea, people will pay me so I can research it and maybe make a product” at best, SCAM at worst.

    A123 are NOT in the Volt. They didnt win the contract. Tesla uses commercial 18650 laptop cells.
    This is why A123 failed – they had no customers. Some genius decided to get a huge contract with Fisker, and they turned out to be a tax/DOE loan scam.

    Chris
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/En-us-schadenfreude.ogg
    thats a nice word to know, thanks!

    Multilayer pcbs and routing:
    Lattice has even nicer app note: http://www.latticesemi.com/lit/docs/package/tn1074.pdf
    + I found this quite educational: http://blogs.mentor.com/tom-hausherr/
    I was interested in a project involving 121 pin 0.8mm pitch BGA chip (USB 3.0 IO chip from Cypress). But routing that on a hobby budget killed the idea (4 layers is minimum :(, pcb houses I looked up could barely make a board at >100 Euro/piece )

    • Chris Gammell says

      October 22, 2012 at 9:27 am

      What feature sizes are required? OSHpark does a 4 layer board every once in a while for $10/sq in (vs $5 for the 2 layer boards).

      • rasz says

        October 22, 2012 at 12:16 pm

        EZ-USB FX3
        http://www.cypress.com/?mpn=CYUSB3012-BZXC

        Basically I wanted a breakout board for it. Idea of fully programmable 100MHz 32bit IO is sexy (370MB/s speed limit). A lot more sexy than dealing with FPGAs and pcie.

        http://www.cypress.com/?docID=39957

        OSHpark does 6 mil traces with 6 mil spaces, This part requires 0.5mils 🙁

        • Chris Gammell says

          October 22, 2012 at 12:32 pm

          .5mils? For a .8mm pitch part? Was that typed correctly? I’ve never had to deal with anything that small.

          • rasz says

            October 22, 2012 at 6:17 pm

            uh, i meant 5 mill 🙂

        • Alex says

          October 22, 2012 at 1:42 pm

          0.5mils for 8mil pitch? That doesn’t sound right to me.

          0.8mm pitch is roughly 31.5mil pitch, and that datasheet you link suggests 9.5mil pad size, which leaves roughly 22 mils between pads. That’s enough enough room to fit 7 mil traces/spaces (7 mil x 3) without issue. It should be totally doable.

          • Alex says

            October 22, 2012 at 2:05 pm

            To add to what I noted above, I just checked for vias. OSH Park does 13mil drill size with 7mil annular ring, which works out 39mil via diameter including annular ring and spacing.

            The diagonal pitch is 44.5mils, and subtract 9.5mils for pad size, and that leaves you with 35mils room for vias. If I did my math right, it seems that while OSH Park specs have no trouble fitting traces between those pads, there isn’t enough room for vias.

            • Laen says

              October 24, 2012 at 6:55 pm

              Yeah, it’s true. 0.8mm BGA probably isn’t possible with OSHPark as it currently stands.

              Are a lot of people doing 0.8mm BGA? I’m nowhere near the fab’s limits, so I can definitely offer a tighter spec service.

              What would be needed for 0.8mm BGA? Would 10 mil drills with 4 mil annular ring do it?

            • Laen says

              October 24, 2012 at 7:11 pm

              ..And I guess the logical followup:

              Are there a lot of chips that are only available in 0.8mm BGA? Is the lack of a cheap PCB service that can make boards for these parts keeping you from making cool stuff?

              If this is a big limiting factor to a lot of makers, I’d be happy to offer tighter specs to support it, but if there are alternatives (like, if most 0.8mm BGA parts are also available in 1mm BGA), then I’ll keep things the way they are.

              • Chris Gammell says

                October 24, 2012 at 10:31 pm

                Not many right now, but a good chunk of processors and FPGAs limit how many families you can get at with QFPs and >.8mm BGAs. The only other problem is that it’d require more layers, possibly 6+. Personally I’ve never seen 4 layer BGAs, but they might be possible.

        • David Kronstein says

          October 25, 2012 at 1:52 pm

          OurPCB.com will do 4/4mil 4 layer boards for about $250 setup and peanuts per board (a dollar per square inch or so)

          I just did an FX3 design, I ended up using 6 layers for easy routing, 4 layers may be possible with a lot of effort.

      • Russ says

        October 25, 2012 at 6:05 pm

        Speaking of OSHPark, when is Laen going to be on the show?

        And yes, even for many hobbyists, 0.8mm BGA is cropping up. The smaller rules also make 1mm BGA much easier to deal with.

    • Chris Gammell says

      October 22, 2012 at 9:29 am

      Also, thanks for those other links. I got the Volt and the Spark mixed up from that article.

    • Dave Jones says

      October 23, 2012 at 5:36 pm

      Can you link to his Kickstarter video and project if still there?
      He seems to claim that Kickstarter was never an option because he is not a US citizen.

  6. Alex says

    October 22, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    Fun thing I just noticed. That Myers Briggs test page that is linked suggests that “software engineer” is INTP-associated, and “electrical engineer” is INTJ-associated.

    The degree I went with in university, was halfway between the “electrical engieneering” and “software engineering” degrees. I’ve taken Myers Briggs tests a few times in the past, and as it turns out half the time they say I’m INTP and half the time they say I’m INTJ.

  7. Mike says

    October 22, 2012 at 11:53 pm

    Before Dave gets too confident about Apple never buying ARM… ARM was founded as a partnership between Acorn, VLSI, and, yes, Apple. At the time they needed a powerful and efficient processor for the Newton. According to Wikipedia, their holding dropped to 14.8% by 1999, down from 43%. They don’t need any more than that really.

  8. Ryan says

    October 25, 2012 at 12:03 am

    Fun show!

    Dr. James Truchard (NI) – Technical founder (1976), still CEO of $1B company.

    • Chris Gammell says

      October 25, 2012 at 11:07 pm

      Ah, another good example. Still knows his stuff too, I’ve seen one or two of his talks.

Copyright © 2025